Dear Culturati Insider,
What’s the biggest threat to your strategy? It's not market disruption or new technology — it's your leadership team. A team stuck in dysfunction — whether it’s infighting, complacency, or over-collaboration — can quietly derail even the best plans. But, if you can tackle that challenge head-on, assess and realign your team for high performance, you’ll move faster and further than most.
As we dive deeper into integrating technologies like AI and gene editing, responsible leadership matters more than ever. Innovation without thoughtful, structured review invites unnecessary risks. Those who balance AI’s potential with human talent, while building frameworks to minimize unintended consequences, will have the edge. Implementing a measured approach — focused on realistic, gradual integration — will allow AI to drive sustained impact when treated as a long-term tool rather than a quick fix.
Our Culturati:AI Taskforce is focused on similar issues, namely how AI influences culture and raises questions for leaders from the perspectives of a) Automation, b) Augmentation, and c) Agency.
And when it comes to reaching net zero, the challenge is huge, but so is the opportunity. Companies that invest in energy innovation will lead the future. Those who hesitate will face skyrocketing costs and diminishing returns. Now is the time to move.
Ethically onward,
Myste Wylde, COO
P.S. Join us next Tuesday, September 10th at 11 AM CST for a Culturati: LIVE on "Beyond Code and Content: Unleashing AI's Potential Across Industries" featuring Charlotte Relyea (Senior Partner, McKinsey & Company) and Matthew Duncan (Head of Thought Leadership on the Future of Work, Microsoft), moderated by Shakeel Rashed (Board Member, Partner & Mentor, Capital Factory). Register here.
Why Leadership Teams Fail — And What To Do About It
Harvard Business Review By Thomas Keil and Marianna Zangrillo
Summary: In pursuit of strong performance, CEOs often overlook a critical factor: the health of their leadership team, which is essential for effective strategy execution. A multiyear study of over 100 CEOs revealed three common leadership dysfunctions: the "shark tank," driven by infighting and political maneuvering; the "petting zoo," marked by conflict avoidance and excessive collaboration; and the "mediocracy," characterized by complacency and lack of competence. These dysfunctions erode team effectiveness, stifle innovation, and derail strategic initiatives, demanding a proactive approach to align teams toward high performance. |
Avoiding Harm in Technology Innovation
MIT Sloan Management Review By Tania Bucic and Gina Colarelli O’Connor
Summary: To effectively leverage emerging technologies while minimizing unintended consequences, innovation leaders are encouraged to adopt a structured review process. While advancements in fields like gene editing and AI can drive economic growth and solve critical problems, they also present ethical dilemmas and unforeseen risks. Research shows that most companies lack systematic approaches to assess these risks, often focusing on business imperatives and compliance over ethical considerations. Implementing the Responsible Innovation and Commercialization (RIC) framework — emphasizing anticipation, reflexivity, inclusion, and responsiveness — can help companies responsibly deploy new technologies, aligning innovation with societal values and building stakeholder trust. |
The Brutal Economics of Reaching Net Zero
Bloomberg Businessweek By J.B. MacKinnon
Summary: Achieving net zero emissions by 2050 is technically feasible, but the financial and operational scale is immense, requiring $275 trillion in global investment — roughly 8.8% of global GDP. For businesses, this isn’t just about cost, but a strategic imperative to invest in future energy systems, drive innovation, and create new markets. Rich nations, including the U.S., need to take a "war footing" approach similar to historic efforts like the Manhattan Project to meet climate goals. The opportunity is clear: businesses that lead in scaling renewable energy, electrification, and efficiency will secure long-term competitive advantage, while delays could lead to soaring costs and severe climate consequences. |
Thought Partner
No Mercy / No Malice By Greg Shrove
Summary: Despite the recent shift from hype to skepticism, AI still holds significant promise when used effectively. While some early expectations were exaggerated and immediate returns have been uneven, the true strength of AI lies in its ability to act as a thought partner, improving decision-making and operational efficiency. Studies show AI-assisted teams can outperform others by up to 40%, and those who leverage it strategically are gaining a competitive edge. A measured approach — focused on realistic applications and gradual integration —allows businesses to tap into AI’s full potential without overcommitting to unproven models. By viewing AI as a long-term tool rather than a quick fix, companies can drive sustained, meaningful impact. |
Balancing AI Tools with Human Talent Remains Challenging For Most Companies, Report Says
HR Dive By Carolyn Crist
Summary: One of the key challenges in expanding AI in business is balancing AI integration with human talent, according to CompTIA, a tech industry nonprofit. A survey of over 500 tech professionals identified concerns such as rising infrastructure costs, cybersecurity, and privacy issues. To address these, companies are prioritizing skills development in six critical areas: cybersecurity, AI-driven auto coding, AI network architecture, AI prompt best practices, data analytics, and business process automation. HR’s role in upskilling is essential but often overlooked, despite its importance in maximizing AI’s ROI and minimizing risks. Leading companies are successfully integrating AI by focusing on human-centric productivity, fostering trust, and ensuring equitable practices. |
Want the full newsletter each week in your inbox? Sign up now to save time and stay on top of trends.
LEADERSHIP AND CULTURE
C-SUITE
EMPLOYEES
A.I. AND TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATE RESPONSIBILITY
INCLUSION, DIVERSITY, EQUITY, BELONGING
Comments